Volume 2 Issue 3 Article 9

‘Anthropoholism’ As An Authentic Tool For Environmental Management

Writer(s): Samuel Akpan Bassey 1,

Ever since nonhuman entity along with the environment became a major ethical issue, anthropocentric worldviews have been blamed for all that is morally wrong about our dealings with nature. Those who regard themselves as non-anthropocentrists/ holistic scholars typically assume that the West’s anthropocentric axiologies and ontologies instigate all of the environmental degradations associated with human species. In contrast, a handful of environmental philosophers aver that anthropocentrism is entirely acceptable as a foundation for environmental ethics as human’s perspective cannot be entirely removed from the decision-making process. They often argue that it is possible for the man to act responsibly towards the environment for humanity and its future generation. Thus, there is an ever-present tension between anthropocentrism and holism, with each side trying to dominate each other. In my opinion, these extreme views are lump sided, as such lack room for tolerance. The thrust of this paper is to bridge the gap between these ethical theories with the theory of ‘anthropoholism’. Anthropoholism is a thesis in environmental ethics that acknowledges man (anthropo) values, role in the ecosystem as well as the ontology, but argues that despite this position, man is just a part of nature, such that he cannot exist independently of the environment, or can he be understood without reference to the environment. With this, the theory of anthropoholism is able to bridge the gap between the two extreme views by explaining the connection between them. With the philosophical method of exposition and critical analysis, this work is carried out.

Keyword(s): a:4:{i:0;s:18:"Anthropocentricism";i:1;s:14:"Anthropoholism";i:2;s:19:"African Communalism";i:3;s:11:"Environment";},

  • [1] Watts, J., (2018), We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN, web page: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/oct/08/global-warming-must-not-exceed-15c-warns-landmark-un-report, retrieval date: 04.09.2019.
  • [2] Heidegger, M., (1993). The Question concerning Technology in Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings (Revised and Expanded Edition) (London. Routledge).
  • [3] Barney, K. F., & Perkinson, M. A. (2016). Occupational therapy with aging adults: Promoting quality of life through collaborative practice. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier. P.292
  • [4] Akpan, B. S., & Leonard, N. (2018). Environmental Ethics: From Philosophy To Movement. Bulletin Social-Economic and Humanitarian Research, (2).
  • [5] Okpe, T. A., & Bassey, S. A. (2018). Environmental Problems and the Question of Intergenerational Justice from the Kantian Perspective. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(3), 373-382.
  • [6] Hossein, S. (1968). Man and Nature: The Spiritual Crisis of Modern Man, Vikash Publishing House Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, Bombay, Bangalore, Calcutta, Kanpur, p.I8.
  • [7] Gyekye, K. (2003). “Person and community in African thought”. In P. H Coetzee and A. P. J Roux, (eds.), Philosophy from Africa: Johannesburg. 42.
  • [8] Passmore, John. (1995). Attitude to Nature from Environmental Ethics, edited by Robert Eliot, Oxford University Press, p. 141.
  • [9] Frierson, P. (2013). Metastandards in the Ethics of Adam Smith and Aldo Leopold. Environmental Ethics, 29(2), 171–191. http://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics200729219
  • [10] Remele, K., & Tutu, D. (2013). Animal Protection And Environmentalism. In The Global Guide to Animal Protection (pp. 68–69). Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/j.ctt2tt9r9.40
  • [11] Norton, B. G., (2005). Environmental ethic and weak anthropocentrism. In L. Kalof & T. Satterfield (Eds.), The Earthscan reader in environmental values (p. 81-96). London, UK: Earthscan
  • [12] Light, A., & Rolston III, H. (2003). Introduction: Ethics and environmental ethics. In A. Light & H. Rolston III (Eds.), Environmental ethics: An anthology (p. 1-12). Malden, MA; Blackwell Publishing Inc.
  • [13] Diehm, C. (2010). Minding Nature: Val Plumwood’s Critique of Moral Extensionism. Environmental Ethics, 32(1), 3–16. http://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics20103212
  • [14] Crowther, R. (2019). Wellbeing and self-transformation in natural landscapes. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan., 239
  • [15] Midgley, Mary. (1994). “The End of Anthropocentrism?.” Philosophy and the Natural Environment. eds. Robin Attfield and Andrew Belsey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • [16] Mary Anne Warren, (1997). Moral Status: Obligations to Persons and Other Living Things (Oxford University Press, 43
  • [17] Asouzu, Innocent I. (2007). Ibuarụ: The Heavy Burden of Philosophy beyond African Philosophy. Münster: Lit Publishers
  • [18] Tim Hayward, (1997), “Anthropocentrism: A Misunderstood Problem,” Environmental Values 6, no. 1, 51
  • [19] Haas, P. J. (2005). Elliot Dorff. Love Your Neighbor and Yourself: A Jewish Approach to Modern Personal Ethics. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 2003. xvii, 366 pp. AJS Review, 29(1), 181–183. http://doi.org/10.1017/s0364009405320095
  • [20] Chen, J. (1995). Of Agriculture’s First Disobedience and its Fruit. Vanderbilt Law Review, 48(479), 1261–1332.
  • [21] Mbiti, J.S.(1970). African Religions and Philosophies. New York: Anchor Books. 35
  • [22] Menkiti, I.A.(1984). “Person and Community in African Thought”. In R. A. Wright, (ed.), African Philosophy: An introduction. Lanham: University Press of America. 170
  • [23] Gyekye, K. (1997). Tradition and Modernity: Philosophical Reflections on the African Experience. New York: Oxford University. 49
  • [24] Matolino, B. (2008). The Concept of Person in African Political Philosophy: An Analytical and Evaluative study. PhD Thesis: University of KwaZulu-Natal. 75
  • [25] Mbiti, J. S. 2001. “African religion and the world order”. In Mische, P.M and Merking. (eds) 2001. Toward a global civilisation. The contribution of religions. New York: Peter Lang. pp.361- 370.
  • [26] Tangwa, G. (2006). “Some African reflection on biomedical and environmental ethics”. In Wiredu, K. (ed.) A Companion to African Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. pp. 389. 387-399.
  • [27] Ugwuanyi, L.O. (2011). “Advancing an environmental ethics through the African world-view”. Proceedings of the 1st International Technology, Education and Environment Conference. African Society for Scientific Research (ASSR). 7
  • [28] Kaoma, K.J. (2010). “Ubuntu, Jesus, and Earth: Integrating African religion and Christianity in ecological ethics”. PhD Thesis. Boston University. 88
  • [29] Akpan, B. S., & Adie, T. (2019). Eco-Communitarianism: An African Perspective. Research & Reviews: Journal of Ecology, 7(3), 8-15.
  • [30] OGAR, J. N., & BASSEY, S. A. (2019). African Environmental Ethics. RAIS Journal for Social Sciences, 3(1), 71-81.


Citation type: APA

Samuel Akpan Bassey. (2019). ‘Anthropoholism’ As An Authentic Tool For Environmental Management. Ulusal Çevre Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 2 ( 3 ) , 160-168. http://ijepem.com/volume-2/issue-3/article-9/

Citation type: BibTex

@article{2019, title={‘Anthropoholism’ As An Authentic Tool For Environmental Management}, volume={2}, number={3}, publisher={International Journal of Environmental Pollution and Environmental Modelling}, author={Samuel Akpan Bassey}, year={2019}, pages={160-168} }

Citation type: MLA

Samuel Akpan Bassey. ‘Anthropoholism’ As An Authentic Tool For Environmental Management. no. 2 International Journal of Environmental Pollution and Environmental Modelling, (2019), pp. 160-168.